Thursday, September 18, 2008

Book lover's lament

As most photobook lovers are aware, Blurb recently announced the winners of its Photography Book Now contest. The People's Choice award is to be announced tomorrow. I've had fun browsing previews online but I have yet to take the plunge on actually buying a book. Why? Because just about every one of the winning entries costs $80-$100 per book. I don't know about anyone else but that's more than I would typically spend on any photo book. Add to that the fact that these are digitally printed under conditions of varying quality control, and the question becomes why would anyone buy a Blurb book when hundreds of other professionally printed titles can be found at your local bookstore for under $40?
Blurb's Grand Prize winner: Beth Dow's In The Garden

One reason is that the Blurb book is often the only publication available on a particular artist. If you're really into someone's work the Blurb book may be the easiest way to get it in front of you.

Still, the marketing equation for these Blurb books is an uphill fight. One strategy around it, taken by my friend Chris, is to offer a print with each sale. $100 may be a lot to spend on a book but it's pretty cheap when you include an exhibition quality print.

Speaking of books, Jeff Ladd has just announced a new venture which promises to increase the accessibility of out-of-print photo books. One of my great pet peeves is that so much of photographic history is buried beyond reach in out-of-print books. Photographers are left wandering in the dark. Can you imagine if, for example, scientists operated under the same model? What if scientific papers were published and then left to go out of print? Some lucky or rich scientists would have the benefit of studying prior research, while the great mass would be left to start at square one. Totally ridiculous, of course. Well that's the current state of things in the photo world. Hopefully Errata Editions can make inroads. Go Mr. Whiskets!

from Errata Editions' release of W. Evans' American Photographs

3 comments:

J. Karanka said...

"What if scientific papers were published and then left to go out of print? Some lucky or rich scientists would have the benefit of studying prior research, while the great mass would be left to start at square one. Totally ridiculous, of course."

Well, scientific journals still cost money and are produced by publishers. They milk universities with physical and electronic suscriptions. If you can't pay for them, you have to pay for interlibrary loans, so... not that different really ;-)

Blake Andrews said...

There may be some truth to that, Joni, but I suspect that in general the scientific community has greater access to its research than photographers to their history. Aren't most important papers published online or through easily searchable journals? There may be some small hurdles to access but they seem easily surmounted.

Anonymous said...

I bought the Beth Dow book. The work is fantastic, but the print quality is unfortunately merely so-so. It's quite a lot to ask for $80.

I got the new version of Robert Adams The New West right around the same time, and it is so beautifully printed that it almost brings me to tears. $40.