Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Ten years of Monthly Fallout

Since starting this blog a few years ago I've let my primary website go to seed. I shoot too much. It's hard enough to get it all printed, much less take time to put it on a website that can't express all of what I'm doing and that very few people will look at anyway. So I've basically stopped adding pages to the site.

One of the few sections I've kept current is Monthly Fallout. This section used to be called Photoblog (I actually owned the domain photoblog.com for a while) but that was before the spread of written photoblogs gave that term new meaning. I changed the label in 2006 to Monthly Fallout but the idea remained the same. At the end of each month I post one favorite photo that doesn't seem to fit any category, that I might lose track of otherwise.

A monthly schedule seems to suit me. It forces me to assess on a regular schedule, yet not regular enough to be restricting. I know many blogs post new photos more frequently, once a week or once a day, or even more often. I admire the effort but often these sites seem more obligatory than quality-driven. Someone gives him or herself the goal of posting every X-amount of time in the hope that it'll inspire more regular shooting, which I suppose it does. But unless you're a photo-savant it's very hard to make a memorable photograph every day, or even once a week. Once a month? Just maybe.

I think the problem with the daily photo approach is it puts the cart before the horse. Do you need to set a goal to breath every day? Of course not. You do it regardless of goals, regardless of anything. Photography is no different.

SE Hawthorne, Portland, January 2010

When I posted the above photo today on my website I realized it'd been 10 years since I started Monthly Fallout. My vision has changed a lot since January 2000. Hopefully it will be equally unrecognizable by 2020, while my breathing remains steady.

Monday, February 1, 2010

File under Uncategorizable

I've had a few days now to digest Andrew Stark's Escaping Into Life and I still can't get a handle on it. Is it an academic study? A memoir? A poll? A critique of art history? A retelling of Moby Dick? An ode to Sydney? Or is it, to use Stark's phrase, "A psycho study of the contemporary street photographer"? It seems to be all of those things and yet no label really fits.

In the end I think it falls under uncategorizable, which is of course a category. I'd put The Velvet Monkey Wrench, Semiotext(e), and the recent Macrophenomenal Pro Basketball Almanac in the same grouping. They are all safely beyond any pigeonholing.

Sample page from Escaping Into Life by Andrew Stark

For the most part I enjoy books like these. They exude such originality, free spirit, and just plain weirdness that I have to admire the authors for breaking convention. Escaping Into Life has all of those traits in spades, not to mention it is ostensibly about street photography. I feel like I should love this book.

The problem is that, beyond the indisputable fact that it's wholly original, I just can't figure the thing out. It's like a Pollack painting. Looks great but don't ask me to make any sense of it. But give me time. I'm going to make a few more stabs.

If you want your own shot email Andrew Stark. The book currently exists as a 198 page PDF which Stark is shopping to publishers. Maybe it will make it to print form someday. In the meantime, if you can explain it please let me know.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

What To Do? #57

169. Pioneer Square, Portland, 2006

170. Main St., Springfield, 2007

171. Waterfront Park, Portland, 2009


(WTD? is a weekly installment of old unseen b/w photos)

Thursday, January 28, 2010

So you think you know photography sites?

How many of the following photography related websites can you identify solely from their favicons? Of course you can cheat by loading various URLs, but to really test yourself try printing out this page and going from memory.

One point for each of the following:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.


A little bit harder now. Two points for each of these:

10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.


Gotta be a serious photo geek. Three points each:

19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.


When you're done you can score yourself as follows (54 points possible):
0 - 5: Computer you say? Where's the ON button on that thing?
6 - 15: I use my computer to check email occasionally but that's about it.
16 - 30: The majority of photographs I encounter are on a monitor.
31 - 45: I hold my breath whenever I travel outside the Wi-Fi cloud.
46 - 54: I really should get out more. Maybe tomorrow. What day is it? Or is it night?