Monday, December 7, 2009

Old New Topographics

It's hard to overstate the historic influence of 1975's New Topographics show at George Eastman House. The show crystalized a seismic shift in landscape photography which is still reverberating more than three decades later. What's more, the show was amazingly perceptive in predicting future stars at a young age. Adams, Baltz, The Bechers, Deal, Goehlke, Nixon, Shore, Wessel. All have gone on to become superstars but at the time they were what we nowadays would call emerging artists. To collect them all in a bunch back then is like having a rookie card with Williams, Dimaggio, Robinson, Mantle, Musial, and Satchel Paige all in one.

As has happened with other cultural artifacts from the seventies, the thirty year itch is now beginning to kick in. A newly curated retrospective is on its way around the world. Blogs are beginning to give shoutouts. At the end of the month, Steidl will publish a book dealing with the show and its aftermath.

New Topographics, Baby! Coming to a gallery near you...

The original show catalog is long out of print and it will cost you several hundred dollars to track it down. For those unable to find a copy, Steidl's new book will indeed be welcome. The only risk of the new publication is that, as with so many new constructions from music CDs to buildings to photobooks, there is a danger that history will be paved over in the process of reinterpretation. For those curious to see it, here is the original catalog in its entirety.

(Catalog images have been removed at the request of George Eastman House. Sorry.)

Saturday, December 5, 2009

What To Do? #51

151. Chicago El, 2006

152. Chicago El, 2006

153. Chicago El, 2006


(WTD? is a weekly installment of old unseen b/w photos)

Friday, December 4, 2009

Subject matter? Yes, it does.

These photography tips by "Thomas: professional photographer" are hilarious. As with all great satire the closer it models reality the funnier it becomes. In this case, the Thomas photos look very much like actual examples of fine art photography.

Left: Songs of Sentient Beings #1595, 1995 by Bill Jacobson,
Right: Self portrait by Thomas

from The Sky Book by Richard Misrach

Sunset From My Rooftop by Thomas

OK, granted the second example might be stretching it. But anyway, contemporary photography is such a ripe target for parody I'm surprised not to see more sites like this. Come on all you photographers. Why so serious? It's ok to laugh at yourself once in a while.

Thanks to Richard for the tip.

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Thoughts on hoops

Last week exploring the stacks at the U of O library I stumbled on some pre-color work by Roger Mertin that was new to me. Back in the late 1970s Mertin made a project shooting basketball hoops.


from Roger Mertin Records 1976-78

I've long thought about doing such a project myself. I can't walk by a hoop without shooting it, and the thing is they're Everywhere. Maybe in other parts of the world it's different. Maybe you have soccer goals or tennis courts or tetherball? In America we have millions of hoops. They're in parks, driveways, gyms, garages, cul-de-sacs, private spaces, public spaces, rich neighborhoods, poor neighborhoods. They're so ubiquitous we barely notice them. And the best part is each one is unique, as Mertin's photos show.

There's another reason I'm attracted to hoops and it's more personal. From an early age basketball has been a constant in my life. I started playing when I was around 8 or 9 and I've kept at it ever since. I still play a few times a week at the local Y. I spend a lot of winter nights watching games on TV. Truth is I'm a basketball junkie. In comparison, photography is a latecomer in my life.

Webster, NY, 1977, Roger Mertin

I've done enough of both to think there are some parallels between basketball and photography. Both are essentially mental. To excel you need to be in the right flow, the right rhythm. There are times playing basketball when everything seems to go right. I take a shot and I don't even need to watch because I know it's good. Other times my game is out of whack. I make stupid plays without knowing why.

I get the same feeling shooting photos. Sometimes I walk around and it seems like photographs are everywhere. My eyes are active, my vision is on. I take a shot and I know it's good. Other times photography is a struggle. It feels like I'm forcing shots to happen. It all depends on good mental flow.

In both pursuits a certain level of thoughtlessness is central to success. Not thoughtlessness like carelessness but like zen. You can't sit there too long and think about the shot. It just has to happen by itself. Sometimes on the basketball court I'll find myself doing things without any planning. And a few seconds later running down the court I'll wonder "Why did I just to that?" because there was no thought involved so --just as in a breakthrough photo-- the cause is difficult to trace. And in fact there is no thought involved, just flow.

Wyoming, 1977, Roger Mertin

How do you turn that flow on? That's the $64,000 question to which no one knows the answer. "If I knew how to take a good photograph, I'd do it every time," said Doisneau. The same goes for basketball. There are many pro players who know how make a good basketball shot, yet none who do it every time.

No one is perfect and that's beautiful. Wouldn't it suck to make every shot? Life would be a bore. Photography would be pointless. Basketball would be pointless. Part of the charm of both skills is that it makes us confront our imperfection. How do we come to terms with it? Photography, basketball, life... It's all one big self exam.

The only certainty is that 100 percent of shots not taken never find the goal.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Odds and ends

A. James Pomerantz has compiled a pretty comprehensive list of photography related films here. Worth printing out for that next trip to the library. I'll have more to say about Pomerantz's MFA blog in a future post.

B. Over at Urbansand, Darrius Thompson has been building a good collection of interviews with photographers. Worth a look.

C. As reported yesterday here and here among other places, Eggleston is about to find himself on yet another album cover. What is it about his photos?

D. Here is a take on Norman Rockwell that you may not have considered.

E. I think this photograph is incredible:

Hindeloopen, 1996, Hans Van Der Meer

F. Looking to trade prints? I am putting together a curated collective. Contact me if interested. In the meantime, check out Jin Zhu's print exchange.