tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post690682271394607406..comments2024-03-26T23:27:56.399-07:00Comments on B: Shore callBlake Andrewshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07187987264904729243noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post-81138649889470307202010-11-13T16:17:31.345-08:002010-11-13T16:17:31.345-08:00You're right that some of these are blown out ...You're right that some of these are blown out as well as strangely colored. Generally a book is probably more reliable. If online images are Darwin's finches, books are the Galapagos. Both change over time but one diversifies much more rapidly and erratically than the other. Who knows how that Shore image will look in 100 years?Blake Andrewshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07187987264904729243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post-68057934676315959882010-11-09T18:26:12.662-08:002010-11-09T18:26:12.662-08:00To me the most stark difference between the images...To me the most stark difference between the images on your page and the print in my one-picture book (no. 43) is the tonal range, not the color pallette. The sky is blown out in most of the computer images but not on my print...or is it my computer monitor?Benhttp://www.bennettlevinephotographs.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post-51435311111780746622010-11-07T07:33:29.547-08:002010-11-07T07:33:29.547-08:00What's up with the exposure in the sky? Some o...What's up with the exposure in the sky? Some of these look like they are altered beyond color-space.Christianhttp://www.mchristianphotos.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post-10800956244436516842010-11-06T08:35:45.330-07:002010-11-06T08:35:45.330-07:00No, sorry, I didn't intend to remain invisible...No, sorry, I didn't intend to remain invisible. That comment about books (magazines, too) was mine.Yvonne Mullerhttp://yvonnemuller.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post-9646289688826950032010-11-06T08:31:42.910-07:002010-11-06T08:31:42.910-07:00Yeah, well, there isn't a better arguement for...Yeah, well, there isn't a better arguement for forecasting books as the next fine art ("medium" for lack of a better word). We'll have to come up with a reasonable solution for introductory imagery on the web, where either color isn't used much....or(?) You tell me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post-33086525894139393822010-11-04T16:59:53.967-07:002010-11-04T16:59:53.967-07:00Great point. I teach colour management here in Aus...Great point. I teach colour management here in Australia and am amazed at how few people understand or care.<br /><br />I alos run a lab, so I love people making prints and book.Paul Atkinshttp://www.atkins.com.aunoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post-9342597851951262662010-11-04T12:26:13.583-07:002010-11-04T12:26:13.583-07:00I hope that Jim Lewis is right and the photobooks ...I hope that Jim Lewis is right and the photobooks are here for awhile. Personally I prefer books for looking carefully at photos, over using the internet - and it has little to do with colour accuracy.Droidnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post-79656968503853115242010-11-03T16:18:57.078-07:002010-11-03T16:18:57.078-07:00i like nr 4 :-)i like nr 4 :-)Olga Bemahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03919156637292332370noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post-55270810272058579822010-11-03T15:29:41.533-07:002010-11-03T15:29:41.533-07:00To make matters worse, most photographers aren'...To make matters worse, most photographers aren't using color accurate displays, let alone the general public so its an impossible task at present. Video production faces the same challenges, and the standards the adhere to can't approach the accuracy of physical printing. <br /><br />Monitors are not prints and if you want to see what a photograph really looks like, you need to print it, or you need to go see a print on exhibit.Rich Seilinghttp://craftingphotographs.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post-56083217454212233912010-11-03T15:04:34.621-07:002010-11-03T15:04:34.621-07:00The web was my primary outlet for photography. But...The web was my primary outlet for photography. But a while back I spent a couple hundred dollars on a color calibration thing for my computer and many many hours putting together a web site, only to go to my sister-in-law's house pull up my site and have photos look really really badly.<br /><br />I still play on the web, but the finished product as far as I'm concerned is again the print.Nick David Wrighthttp://blog.nickdavidwright.net/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post-8187623379564746622010-11-03T11:54:57.337-07:002010-11-03T11:54:57.337-07:00Doesn't size matter as well?
Stephen used an 8...Doesn't size matter as well?<br />Stephen used an 8x10 view camera to create this image.Frednoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4935046131385109105.post-9993450481302121972010-11-03T10:20:39.518-07:002010-11-03T10:20:39.518-07:00brilliant! But this improved version is still my ...brilliant! But this improved version is still my favorite:<br /><br />http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_3daWmT7PPCY/TKn0_FI4YgI/AAAAAAAAGrM/ZabS_uoLxDE/s1600/shore2.jpgwolfnoreply@blogger.com